当前位置:诺一范文网>范文大全 > 公文范文 > 可再生柴油:仔细考察项目回报和风险(全文)

可再生柴油:仔细考察项目回报和风险(全文)

时间:2022-07-05 15:30:03 公文范文 浏览量:

下面是小编为大家整理的可再生柴油:仔细考察项目回报和风险(全文),供大家参考。

可再生柴油:仔细考察项目回报和风险(全文)

 

 Equit y

 R es ea r ch A mer ic a s

 |

 U nit ed

 S ta tes

  In

 thi s

 r epor t

 w e t a k e a c loser

 loo k

 a t

 the

 8

 r enew a ble

 diesel

 pr oje ct s

 a nnounced

 by

 U S independent

 r ef iner s .

 We

 a r e ca lc ula ti ng

 EB IT DA

 ( w it h

 a nd

 without

 B T C ) ,

 I RR,

 cost o f

 c a pa ci ty a ddit ions

 ( $ /g a l)

 a nd

 br ea k even

 c a r bon

 pr ic e needed

 to

 k eep

 pr oj ect s

 a bove

 10 %

 IR R .

 We

 a r e a lso

 hig hli g hti n g

 str eng ths

 a nd

 wea k nes s e s

 of

 i ndividua l

 pr ojec ts.

 Th e

 D e b at e :

 Depen ding

 upon

 how

 bulli s h

 or

 bea r ish

 a n

 i nves tor

 i s

 on

 ca r bon

 pr ic in g ,

 w e would

 cl a ss if y

 t hem

 a s :

 1 )

 C a r bon

 pr ic e opt imist

 -

 be li eves i n

 wide s pr ea d

 L CF S

 a dopti on tha t

 w ill

 s uppor t

 hig he r

 c a r bon

 p r i ces;

 2 )

 Pr a g m a ti s t

 – beli eves c a r bon

 pr ic es

 will

 move

 up in

 the

 long e r

 ter m

 but

 sees

 nea r - ter m

 vola ti li ty

 i f

 a ll

 a nnounced

 ca pa ci ty

 a ddit ions

 ( ~ 2.6 B n g a l/

 y r )

 c om e onl ine;

 3 )

 B T C

 opt i mist

 -

 beli eves r enew a bles

 is the

 f utur e ,

 but

 stil l

 bea r ish on

 c a r bon

 pr ic in g ,

 a nd

 see s

 B T C

 g ett ing

 ex tended

 pa s t

 2022

 a s

 C ong r es s

 wa nts

 to enco ur a g e us e of

 l ow e r

 c a r bon

 f uels ;

 a nd

 4 )

 Pes s imist

 – bea r ish

 on

 c a r bon

 pr ic es

 a nd beli eves r enew a ble

 tr a de

 i s

 IMO

 2020

 ve r s ion

 2.0 .

 S inc e we

 a r e i n

 ea r ly

 sta g es ,

 w e ex pect the

 ca r bon

 pr ic e

 optimist

 to

 be

 th e m os t

 eng a g ing

 a nd

 dr ive

 the

 r e new a bles

 tr ade.

  Ou r

 P r e feren c e :

 While

 m ultipl e pr ojec ts

 ha ve

 been

 a nnounced,

 w e ha ve

 a str ong pr ef er en ce

 f o r

 pr o jects

 tha t

 a r e u s ing

 f eeds toc k

 with

 l ow er

 c a r bon

 i ntensity

 ( C I) .

 V L O ’s

 S t. C ha r les a nd

 Por t

 A r thur

 ca n

 del iv er

 g ood

 r etur ns

 even

 without

 B T C

 or

 i n

 a n

 envir onment w her e c a r bon

 pr ic es

 d r op

 t o

 ~ $120 /t on.

 It

 does cost mo r e t o

 c on s tr uct

 pr oje ct s

 with

 l ow er C I

 f eeds toc k ,

 but

 a pr ojec t

 using f eed

 with

 C I

 of

 25

 ha ve

 a n

 a lmos t

 ~ $0.75 / g a l

 g r os s m a r g in

 a dvanta g e over

 a pr ojec t

 us ing

 C I

 of

 53.86 .

 Put

 a nother

 w a y ,

 a pr ojec t

 w it h

 C I

 o f 25

 ha s

 a n

 a lmos t

 $50 - $60 /t on

 c a r bon

 pr ic in g

 a dvanta g e over

 a hi g her

 C I

 p r ojec t.

 A

 l ow er C I

 pr ojec t

 ca n

 withstand

 a much

 w ea k er

 ca r bon

 pr ic e envir onment

 vs.

 hig her

 C I

 f eed pr ojec t .

 O n

 pa per ,

 both

 Ma r ti nez

 ( IR R

 42 % )

 a nd

 R odeo

 ( IR R

 24 % )

 conver s ion s

 look a tt r a ct ive,

 but

 g iven

 the

 pr o x imity

 of

 t he

 t w o

 r e f ine r ies ,

 w e ex pect

 competit ion

 f o r

 f eeds toc k a s

 well

 as

 pr oduct

 pl a cement.

 A t

 thi s

 sta g e ,

 Ma r ti nez

 f u ll

 conver s io n

 ( Pha s e 1

 2022 s ta r tup )

 ha s

 a f ir s t - m over

 a dvanta g e over

 R odeo

 f ull

 conve r s ion

 ( 2024

 s ta r tup ) .

 U p si d e

 and

 Ri sks:

 If

 L CF S

 be c om es

 a na ti ona l

 m a nda te,

 c a r bon

 pr ic es

 will

 move

 up ( $220 - $250 /t on)

 a nd

 L CF S

 c r e dit s

 will

 pr ic e hi g her ,

 r a ising

 I RR

 of

 a ll

 pr ojec ts.

 O n

 t he other

 ha nd

 i f

 L CF S

 d o e s

 n o t

 g e t

 w ider

 a dopti on

 out s ide

 of

 C a li f o r nia

 a nd

 a ll

 a nnounced ca pa ci ty

 ex pa ns ions

 come

 onli ne, ca r bon

 c r edit

 ba nk would

 buil d

 r a pidl y

 a nd

 c a r bon

 pr ic es would

 dr op ,

 puttin g

 ec onom ic s

 of

 ma ny

 pr ojec ts

 in

 s ing le

 di g it s

 ( IR R

 bel ow

 10 % ) .

 C a li f or nia diesel

 dema nd

 i s

 f la t;

 r ef ine r ies c onver ti ng

 to

 r enew a bl e di es el

 f a ci li ty

 ( M a r ti nez

 a nd

 S a n F r a n )

 a r e g oing

 to

 pr oduce

 diesel

 a t

 the

 ex pense of

 g a s oli ne. Even tua l ly ,

 C a li f o r nia ’s

 diesel m a r k et

 w ill

 become

 over s uppli ed

 a nd

 g a s oli ne

 under s uppli ed

 ( bull i s h

 PB F ) .

 Co n c l u sio n :

 Wi th

 thi s

 ma g nit ud e of

 c a pa ci ty

 a nnouncem ents, r e f iner s

 a r e ma k ing

 a n implic it

 a ss um pti on

 tha t

 the

 D em ocr a ti c

 pr es ident ia l

 ca ndida te

 w ill

 ta k e t he

 W hit e H ouse i n N ov em ber .

 T his

 w ill

 s ig nif ic a ntl y

 i ncr ea s e t he

 poss ibi li ty

 o f

 L CF S

 b ecoming

 a na ti ona l m a nda te ,

 or

 a t

 le a s t

 a m or e r a pid

 a dopti on

 a cr os s

 m ultipl e s t a tes ,

 pus hing

 up

 ca r bon

 pr ic es , r a ising

 EB IT DA

 a nd

 IR R

 pr oje ct io ns .

 In

 the

 event

 P r es ident

 Tr ump

 g ets

 r e - ele cted ,

 s om e of these

 pr ojec ts

 coul d

 be

 de lay ed

 or

 c a ncel led.

 Rese ar c h

 An aly sts

 Ma n a v

 G up ta

 212

 325

 6617

 m a nav.gupta @ c redit - s uis s e. c om

 D IS CLOSU RE

 AP P E ND IX

 AT

 TH E

 B ACK

 O F

 TH IS

 REP O RT

 CONTA IN S

 IMP O RT ANT

 D IS CLOSU RE S ,

 ANALYST CE RT IFICATIONS, LE G AL

 E NTITY

 D IS CLOSU RE

 AND

 TH E

 S TA TU S

 O F

 NON - U S

 ANALYSTS.

 U S

 Discl os ur e :

 C r edit

 S uiss e does a nd

 s eek s

 to

 do

 business w it h

  compa nies

  cover ed

  in

  it s

  r e s ea r ch

 r epor ts.

  A s

  a

 r es ult ,

  inve s tor s

  s hould

  be

  a w a r e

 tha t

  the

  F ir m

  m a y

  ha ve

  a

 conf li ct

  of

  int e r e s t

  tha t

  coul d

 Renewa ble

 Diesel Cl oser Loo k

 a t

 R eturn s

 and Risk s

 for

 Proje c ts

 O il

 &

 Ga s

 R ef ini ng

 &

 M a r k eti n g

 |

 Ex per t

 Ins ig h ts

  T a ble

 of

 Cont en ts

 Ex ecut ive

 S umm a r y

 ................................................................................................................. 3

 S umm a r y

 of

 R etur ns

  3

 Wha t

 would

 m a k e us

 m or e B ull ish?

  5

 Wha t

 would

 m a k e us

 B ea r i s h ?

  6

 B r ea k even

 A na ly s is

  ................................................................................................................. 8

 R enew a bles

 T r a de

 – T he

 Deba te

  ........................................................................................... 9

 A

 C loser

 L ook

 a t

 Individua l

 Pr ojec ts

  ..................................................................................... 10

 HFC

 – A r tesia

 a nd

 C h eyenne

  10

 VL O

 – S t.

 C ha r les E x pa ns ion

  13

 VL O

 – Por t

 A r thur

  15

 PS X

 – R odeo

 F ul l

 C onver s ion

  17

 MPC – Ma r ti nez

 F ul l

 C onver s ion

  19

 PS X

 – R odeo

 Di es el

 Hy d r ot r ea ter

 Pr ojec t

  21

 C VI

 – Wy nnewood

 Hy dr o cr a ck er

 Pr ojec t

  23

 A ppendix

  ............................................................................................................................... 25

 How t o

 c a lc ula te

 Gr os s

 M a r g in

 f or

 i ndividua l

 pr oje ct s

  25

 R ene w a ble

 Diesel vs.

 B io - diesel

  27

 700

  600

  500

  400

  300

  200

  100

  0

 MPC

 Martinez

 VLO

 St.

 Charles

  VLO

 Port

 Arthur

 PSX

 Rodeo

 HFC

 Artesia

 & Conversion

 Converison

  Cheyenne

  Without

 BTC

 ext.

 With

 BTC

 ext.

  Executiv e

 Summ a r y

 Sum mary

 of

 R et ur ns

 In

 thi s

 r epor t

 w e t a k e a c loser

 loo k

 a t

 the

 8

 r enew a ble

 diesel

 pr oje ct s

 a nnounced

 by independent

 r ef iner s .

 We

 a r e ca lc ula ti ng

 EB IT DA

 upside

 ( w it h

 a nd

 without

 B T C ) ,

 I RR,

 cost o f ca pa ci ty

 a ddit ions

 a nd

 br ea k even

 c a r bon

 pr ic e needed

 t o

 k eep

 pr o jec t

 IR R’s

 a bove

 10 % .

 We a r e a lso

 hig hli g hti n g

 str en g ths

 a nd

 wea k nes s es

 of

 i ndividua l

 pr ojec ts.

 E B ITDA

 O ur

 ba s e c a s e nor m a li zed

 EB IT D A

 estima tes

 a r e c a lc ula te d

 on

 cur r ent

 ca r bon

 p r ic es

 of

 ~ $196 /t on.

 How ever ,

 in

 indi vidu a l

 pr ojec ti on

 secti on

 we

 ha ve

 r un

 s ens it ivit ies on

 EB IT DA

 ba s ed on

 c a r bon

 pr ic es

 r a ng e of

 $140 - $240 /t on.

 O ur

 nor m a li zed

 EB IT DA

 estima tes

 a s

 show n

 i n

 F ig .

 1

 e x cl ude

 a ny

 bene f it

 o f

 B T C .

 We

 ha ve

 r un

 scena r io

 a na ly s is on

 a ll

 pr ojec ts

 to

 ca lc ula te EB IT DA

 a ss um ing

 B T C

 does g et s

 ex tended

 f or

 5

 y ea r s

 post

 2022 ,

 but

 a l ow er

 c r edit

 benef it

 of

 $0.50 / g a l

 vs .

 cur r ent

 $1 /g a l.

  Figu r e

 1 :

 E B ITDA

 -

 M ajo r

 P r o j e c t s

 ($M )

  Figu r e

 2 :

 E B ITDA

 -

 S mal l e r

 C o n v e r sio n

 P r o j e c t s

 ($M )

  Sourc e: C om pa ny

 da t a ,

 C redit

 Suis s e es t im a t es

 (* VL O

 E B I T DA

 is net )

 Sourc e: C om pa ny

 da t a ,

 C redit

 Suis s e es t im a t es

 IRR

 Pr ojec ts

 that’ s

 do

 come

 onli ne

 b ef or e y ea r

 end

 2022 ,

 w ill

 be

 see

 a n

 upl if t

 in

 IR R

 a s

 t hey

 a r e g ett ing

 f ull

 bene f it

 o f

 B T C

 o f

 $1 / g a l.

 O ur

 ba s e c a s e IR R

 es ti m a tes

 a r e c a lc ulated

 on

 c ur r ent ca r bon

 pr ic es

 o f

 ~ $196 / ton.

 Ho w ever ,

 in

 indi vidua l

 pr oje ct ion

 s ec ti on

 w e ha ve

 r un

 sens it ivit ies on

 EB IT DA

 ba s ed

 on

 ca r bon

 pr ic es

 r a ng e of

 $140 - $240 / ton.

 W e ha ve

 r un

 scena r io

 a na ly s is on a ll

 pr ojec ts

 to

 ca lc ula te

 IR R

 a ss um ing

 B T C

 does g ets

 e x tended

 f o r

 5

 y ea r s

 post

 2022 ,

 but

 a lower

 c r edit

 benef it

 o f

 $0.50 / g a l

 vs .

 cur r ent

 $1 / g a l.

 Without

 BTC

 ext.

 With

 BTC

 ext.

 CVI

 Wynewood

 Hydrocracker

 PSX

 San

 Fran

 Hydrotreater

 120

  100

  80

  60

  40

  20

  0

 EBITDA

  ($M)

 EBITDA

  ($M)

 40%

 30%

 20%

 10%

 0%

 MPC

 Martinez

  VLO

 St.

 Charles

  VLO

 Port

 Arthur

 PSX

 Rodeo

 HFC

 Artesia

 &

 Conversion

 Converison

 Cheyenne

  Without

 BTC

 ext.

 With

 BTC

 ext.

 150%

  100%

  50%

  0%

 PSX

 San

 Fran

 Hydrotreater

 CVI

 Wynewood

 Hydrocracker

 Without

 BTC

 ext.

 42%

 With

 BTC

 ext.

 IRR

 (%)

 IRR

 (%)

 Figu r e

 3 :

 IR R

 ( % )

 –

 M ajo r

 P r o j e c t s

  80%

 Figu r e

 4 :

 IR R

 ( % )

 –

 S mal l e r

 C o n v e r sio n

 P r o j e c t s

  350%

 70%

 300%

 60%

  250%

 50%

  200%

  Sourc e: C om pa ny

 da t a ,

 C redit

 Suis s e es t im a t es

 Sourc e: C om pa ny

 da t a ,

 C redit

 Suis s e es t im a t es

 Co st

 o f

 ad d i n g

 n e w

 c ap ac i t y

 It

 does cost mor e t o

 c ons tr u ct

 ...

推荐访问:可再生柴油:仔细考察项目回报和风险 柴油 可再生 考察

版权所有:诺一范文网 2017-2024 未经授权禁止复制或建立镜像[诺一范文网]所有资源完全免费共享

Powered by 诺一范文网 © All Rights Reserved.。备案号:豫ICP备17041497号-1